Whole file
benroeder/conductor
The author described this change as “Fix duplicate wait() method bug and achieve 100% coverage”. It counts as a record because the check below fails on the code as it stood at ca22d7f39 and passes on 7d4bffbca, with nothing else changed between the two runs.
Projectbenroeder/conductor
Fix saved2025-06-04
Sharing licenceBSD-3-Clause · LICENSE
Change size+1 −1
What the code was meant to do, written into the code itself as a save note
Fix duplicate wait() method bug and achieve 100% coverage
The change
| 71 | 71 | """Tell the server we're ready to go.""" | |
| 72 | 72 | pass | |
| 73 | 73 | ||
| 74 | - | def wait(self): | |
| 74 | + | def wait_ready(self): | |
| 75 | 75 | """Wait on the server""" | |
| 76 | 76 | pass | |
| 77 | 77 |
The check that tells the two apart
fail→pass·tests/test_step.py::TestStepPlaceholderMethods::test_wait_ready_method_exists
Check file tests/test_step.py, taken without changes from the fix and copied onto the older code, so the exact same check runs against both versions.
Origin and history
The code before itca22d7f3991034420ba68a300c983d38d27e888d
Broken version dated2025-06-04
Moduleconductor.step
Units changedStep
Fingerprint0c84e45ae788c375
Checked2026-08-18 by goldset/0.1
Every field above is generated by our program. None of it is written by hand.