Whole file

SilentFleetKK/ai-market-pulse

The author described this change as fix: base portfolio allocation_pct on gross exposure, not net. It counts as a record because the check below fails on the code as it stood at 9add4d681 and passes on d725ba504, with nothing else changed between the two runs.

Fix saved2026-07-09
Sharing licenceMIT · LICENSE
Change size+3 1

What the code was meant to do, written into the code itself as a save note

fix: base portfolio allocation_pct on gross exposure, not net

The change

1010 totals_by_currency: dict[str, float] = {}
1111 for position in positions:
1212 if position:
13- totals_by_currency[position.currency] = totals_by_currency.get(position.currency, 0) + position.market_value
13+ totals_by_currency[position.currency] = totals_by_currency.get(position.currency, 0) + abs(
14+ position.market_value
15+ )
1416
1517 enriched: list[AssetAnalysis] = []
1618 for analysis, position in zip(analyses, positions):

The check that tells the two apart

failpass·tests/test_portfolio.py::test_enrich_portfolio_offsetting_positions_get_gross_exposure_allocation

Check file tests/test_portfolio.py, taken without changes from the fix and copied onto the older code, so the exact same check runs against both versions.

Origin and history

The code before it9add4d681dc794dbafb57ecc4a3148e1d3cb0ef2
Broken version dated2026-07-09
Moduleai_market_pulse.portfolio
Units changedenrich_portfolio
Fingerprinte084c39afce496d5
Checked2026-08-18 by goldset/0.1

Every field above is generated by our program. None of it is written by hand.

Other bugs found in SilentFleetKK/ai-market-pulse